Your platform vendor has moved on. They've built a modern SaaS product and they want you on it. But you're still running the version you implemented years ago. The reason is simple: there is no direct or easy upgrade path.
You cannot redeploy a C#/ASP.NET Framework site onto a modern React/Next.js/Vercel SaaS platform. There is no magic button. The site has to be rebuilt. And traditional agencies price these rebuilds at €250K up through and past €1M.
At that price point, migration is a boardroom fight. Most customers don't move. They stay on legacy, pay maintenance1, and quietly consider whether they even want to stay on the platform at all.
The result: you're stuck. The platform is ageing, the maintenance costs are climbing, and every agency you talk to quotes a number that makes migration impossible to justify.
Migrate first. Improve later.
What's needed is a lift and shift — a technology refresh. Take the existing site, same content, same structure, same functionality, and rebuild it on the modern SaaS platform. No redesign. No scope change. Just move the technology forward.
This is the critical discipline, and it's where the industry has consistently failed. The moment a migration project allows scope change — "while we're at it, let's also redesign the homepage, add a new product section, rethink the navigation" — it stops being a migration and becomes a replatforming programme. This is the single most common reason DXP migration projects dramatically exceed their budget — or fail outright.2
A clean lift and shift avoids this entirely. Migrate first. Improve later. Two separate projects, two separate budgets, two separate decisions.
The domain knowledge required hasn't changed. You still need to understand the source platform's architecture, the content model, the integration points, the rendering pipeline, and the target platform's conventions. That takes 20 years of working with these platforms.
What has changed is the cost of execution. The boilerplate, the component translation, the template rebuilding, the CSS rework, the content mapping — the volume work that traditionally took a team of 4-6 people several months — can now be done by one experienced architect working with AI tooling in a fraction of the time.
€250K+→€50–85K
Same migration. AI-leveraged delivery changes the economics.
Who this is for
Sitecore customers on Managed Cloud or on-prem — version 5.x through 10.4. Moving to XM Cloud, Content SDK, or SitecoreAI. This is our deepest area of expertise and where the AI-leveraged cost advantage is most dramatic.
Optimizely/Episerver customers on pre-SaaS installations, moving to Optimizely SaaS or evaluating alternatives.
Other CMS platforms. Craft CMS, TYPO3, WordPress, Drupal — moving onto headless platforms like Contentful, Sanity, Prismic, or Storyblok. The technology pairing differs but the approach is the same: lift and shift, AI-leveraged, fixed price.
Discuss your platform →
Not for customers who want a redesign, rebrand, or new feature development bundled into the migration. That's a replatforming programme — different engagement, different economics, different risks. This service migrates what exists. Design refresh and new features follow as a separate project.